Present your research to the world in confident English.
Your data is publishable. Your conclusions are sharp. The reviewer comment that says 'language needs improvement' is the last thing standing between your work and the journals you target.
What gets in your way today.
International collaborations stall on calls
Email back-and-forth is manageable. The 30-minute video sync with your co-PI in Boston is where momentum quietly dies.
Peer-review responses take days
You know the experiments. You know the answers. But framing a polite, structured rebuttal to a senior reviewer in English — that's a different kind of work.
Conference posters become silent
Visitors stop, ask one question, you stumble on the response — and they move on. Years of work compressed into a two-minute conversation you weren't ready for.
A platform built for the way you work.
Upload your poster or abstract — the AI runs you through 5-, 10-, and 20-minute Q&A simulations at junior, peer, and senior-reviewer pressure levels.
Submit your manuscript or response-to-reviewers — get back annotated suggestions covering clarity, register, scientific verb tense, and the specific phrasing patterns peer reviewers reward.
Practice the meeting types that fill a researcher's week — co-authorship calls, study-section discussions, grant-collaborator syncs — with AI playing senior, peer, and junior interlocutors.
Survey of 220 biomedical researchers across Spain and Latin America. Top barriers: written clarity (68%), revision-response speed (54%), conference Q&A confidence (49%).
The Professional plan.
- Advanced voice model with 105 Live Call minutes per week
- All 50+ scenarios including research/grant tracks
- Writing & documentation review (2/month) — manuscripts, abstracts, rebuttals
- Personalized learning path aligned to your research timeline
- Verified author credits for review history